Encountering NIMROD,
Clarifying Values

During the years of my childhood, my family went camping
every summer, sometimes on Cape Cod, most often in the White Mountains of New
Hampshire. We began with one tent, and as the family grew a second tent was
added, our campsite becoming a veritable encampment. My parents were purists,
only tents, never any thought of a trailer or even one of the pop-up varieties,
a “tent-camper,” as we called them with some scorn. Nevertheless, the
tent-campers fascinated me, always eager to befriend the kids of such families
in order to get to see their home in the woods up close. Accepting my parents’
good-humored dogma that real campers slept on the ground, I think what really
fascinated me, beyond the technology of a tent folded neatly into a metal
container on wheels, was the brand name on most, if not all, of the
tent-campers. I can still see the letters that fascinated me then, big letters
that spelled the word, NIMROD.
I didn’t realize for some time, that the name of
the camper was actually the name of a person. At some point I picked up a
general sense that this was a famous hunter. Shrouded in mystery, I assumed
this Nimrod was a quite a camper, surely sleeping on the ground, probably not
very happy to be associated with those who didn’t.

To my surprise, I next encountered Nimrod one year in Hebrew
school. Seeing his name in Hebrew letters, I immediately saw the large English
letters of his name on those pop-up tent-campers. Suddenly day dreaming of the
past summer’s camping trip, enough information filtered through from the page
and the teacher’s voice to bring me back to the moment. I started to realize
with consternation that this Nimrod for whom the campers were named was not
such a nice guy. Maybe he had been a great woodsman, a great hunter, but he was
also quite a tyrant,
the one who wanted to throw the young Avram into a
fiery furnace for rejecting his countries dogmas, for daring to be an
iconoclast, literally smashing his father’s idols on his way to following one
creator God in whose image all people are created equally.
I worried for Avram, seeing something of
myself in his familiar stubbornness and insistence on following what he
believed to be right.

I thought of those long ago campers as I read the Torah
portion
No’ach (Gen. 6:9-11:32). Year
after year I am drawn to the earlier parts of the portion, to the enticing and
familiar stories of No’ach and the ark, of the violence that filled the earth,
of God’s promise following the flood never to destroy the earth again, yet
waiting desperately for us to make the same promise. I am always drawn to what
seems to be the more exciting campsites and the more compelling stories to be
told around the campfire. Yet every year as I come to the end of the portion I
pause with amazement when I encounter Nimrod. This is the source of the hunter
and woodsman who I first encountered, fittingly, in the woods.
In reading of Nimrod this year, I thought of a teaching of
the Slonimer Rebbe, that all of the Book of Genesis is meant to help us clarify
values, to purify qualities and ways of being and behaving in the world. It is
all about taharat ha’middot/clarifying of
values. I began to wonder about Nimrod, about the values we are to learn,
remembering what he tried to do to the young Avram, feeling the tension between
the evil I sensed of him and the trailblazer in the woods who beckoned to me,
the young camper who wanted to swing an axe and handle a knife and be a hero.
It begins simply enough, and yet there is something
mysterious, as though pushing us to ask, but who is he really? The Torah says
simply, Cush begot Nimrod; he began to be
a hero upon the earth/hechel li’hi’yot gibor ba’aretz (Gen. 10:8). Just
what is a gibor, what is the nature
of his being a hero? Gibor can be a
hero, a mighty one, someone of strength. But what is the nature of that
strength? Much of the latter part of the portion of No’ach offers a lens through which to consider how we use our
gifts, our strength, how we use technology and intelligence, whether to build a
tower of Babel to storm the heavens or to create an ark in which to ride out
the storm, offering a model of harmony, lion and lamb together, a way yet to be
realized after the flood.
We are told next that Nimrod is a
gibor tzayid lifnei ha’shem/a crafty hero before God. Most
translations translate
tzayid in its
more usual meaning as a hunter. In translating
gibor tzayid as “crafty hero,” Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (19th
century Germany) is drawing on a root meaning of
tzayid as deceit and deceiver,
tzad.
The hunter needs to be secretive and quiet, to utilize stealth and wiles.

As
much as I disdain hunting, except by those for whom it is truly for the sake of
sustenance, I can respect those who respect the animals, even in the course of
hunting them. This is not the way of Nimrod as seen through the lens of a
tradition that saw the mistreatment of animals as a precursor to the
mistreatment of people. Establishing himself as a great hunter, Nimrod sowed
fear with his prowess, gradually turning to people as his pray.
Yitzchak Abravanel, a fifteenth century commentator of both
Portugal and Italy, writes that until Nimrod all people were equal, hayu b’nei ha’adam kulam shavim.
Abravanel goes on to say that the statement “he
became a mighty man in the land,” means he
became a tyrant. In a conversation across centuries, that all of this was
“before God,” becomes the source of a powerful warning from Rabbi Samson
Raphael Hirsch: “Nimrod began to oppress his fellow ‘men’ in the name of God.
He was the first to misuse the name of God, to surround brute force with the
halo of Divine approval…. Nimrod became the prototype for all those dynastic
rulers who craftily crowned themselves with the halo of pseudo-sanctity and
whose power, politics and hypocrisy were characterized by the saying, k’nimrod gibor tzayid lifnei ha’shem/like
Nimrod, a crafty hero before God.”

In a time when truth flows into the ground like the blood of
slain animals, when hubris and hate proliferate, Nimrod appears as an archetype
to remind us of danger along the path of life, of danger on the trail, of whom
not to follow. He becomes a lens through which to clarify values and qualities,
to remind of the treacherous divide between truth and falsehood. Turning from
the ways of Nimrod, we strive to restore human equality as it was in the
beginning, harmony between people and animals, as within the ark upon the
flood, and so with earth, a dove alighting with an olive branch. In a place of
peaceful encampment in the woods, lion and lamb together, Nimrod becomes again
but the name of a simple dwelling that once so intrigued a young child.
Rabbi Victor H. Reinstein