In the Fullness of
Nonviolence
Transcending the
Language of Violence on the Path to Peace and Justice

I tend to eschew martial language, even to a fault, and
often, I admit, it is to a fault. In almost every context of striving, whether
personal or social, or for the sake of analogy and metaphor, I prefer to find
alternatives to what might be construed as military terminology. I prefer to work
for peace and justice, to strive and to struggle, rather than to fight for it.
I find dissonance in the very thought of fighting for peace, easier then to
lose sight of the critical tension between means and ends. The language we use
influences behavior, and subtly gives shape to consciousness and form to
conscience. When called “to pray with our legs,” as in the holy words of Rabbi
Abraham Joshua Heschel, I prefer to walk, to journey, to trek, rather than to
march for whatever good cause summons us to the streets.
From long before I could give it a name, I have been drawn
to the way of pacifism. I generally tend not to call myself a pacifist, but to
see and describe myself as one who seeks to follow its path, to rise to its
challenge. Failing too often to meet its challenge, I continue to seek and to
wrestle, striving to come ever closer to the way of the pacifist. Often
misunderstood, pacifism is not passive. To be true to its own calling, it is
meant always to be active, whether in the larger spheres of life or in the most
intimate, whether in word or deed, witnessed by others or not. It is a way of
love and respect for the human creature and condition that becomes the seedbed
and catalyst for active and creative nonviolence.
A seemingly simple word that has no single, positive way of
expression in English, nonviolence, which I prefer not to write with a hyphen
in order to better convey its own reality, is often as misunderstood as
pacifism. Even though a more common term and referent to action, nonviolence is
rarely recognized for its uncommon depth and breadth. When nonviolence is
expressed or adopted only as a tactic, however preferable to its opposite, we
fail to access its spiritual depth and larger strategic possibility. One can
refrain from picking up a weapon or a stone, but still do nothing to bridge the
chasm that stands not only between people in opposition to each other, but
between the present and a better future.
In the way of Ghandi and King, the spiritual depth and power
of nonviolence lies in its recognition of a common spark of humanity in every
person, the image of God in each one. The challenge is to draw on that common
spark, that common humanity, in seeking ways to bridge the divide that
separates people from each other, helping each side in a struggle to see at
least glimmers of common human ground and of a common stake in the struggle. We
shall overcome does not mean overcoming or defeating the other, but overcoming
the injustice and suffering which the other may in fact represent, ultimately
overcoming that which divides us and bringing our opponent along with us to a
better place for all.
It is so hard to do or even to imagine such bridging in
times of struggle, and yet this is when we are especially called to the
challenge, the process itself illuminating new paths. Even if unable to move an
opponent in the present moment, nonviolence as active witness models for others
a living alternative to violence, hate, and injustice. In the wrestling, we
come to new insight and possibilities. Reflecting a way of striving, shalom as peace emerging form wholeness/sh’laymut can only grow when
the tree of peace is not separated from its root meaning, shalem/whole, complete.

More than terminology, the challenge is to
find a way of striving that will ultimately bring wholeness. It is the way of
the
Sh’ma (Deut. 6:4), “Hear, O,
Israel, God, our God, God is One.” If God is one, than so too, created in God’s
image of oneness, all people are one.
As does any sensitive reader of Torah, I struggle with so
many of the Torah portions as we make our way through the latter part of the
fourth book, Bamidbar, and into the
fifth book, D’varim, in which we
encounter the violence of the Canaanite wars. These portions are among those
that contain what Heschel so helpfully refers to as the harsh passages. In reading and learning Torah, we are meant to
learn how to navigate the harsh passages of both Torah and life, always
remembering that the Torah is not about them and then, but about us and now. So
too, engaging with sacred text, encountering and conversing with commentators
and teachers of other times and places, we realize that our struggles were also
their struggles, all part of a great human struggle toward shalom u’sh’laymut/peace and wholeness.

As for many of our ancestors, I struggle with the language
of these portions, as well as with what that language represents in various
ways of understanding and in the particular bias of a translator. This week’s
portion,
Parashat Ki Tetze (Deut.
21:10-25:19), begins with words that appear several times in the surrounding
portions,
Ki Tetze la’mil’chamah/if you
go forth to war. It need not be an absolute, an assumption of inevitable
human struggle as reflected in the frequent way of translation, “when you go
forth to war.”
If, neither inevitable
nor eternal, the vision is held before us of a world without war,
and they shall beat their swords into
plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword
against nation, neither shall they learn war any more (Isaiah 2:4).
Particularly in Chassidic tradition, the surface meaning,
the p’shat, is transformed almost
immediately to reflect a different reality. In this way of reading, the Torah
is not speaking about warring peoples, of external battles, but of internal
struggle to change and bring out the best that resides deep within our selves
and others. It is the essence of nonviolence and is not dissimilar to the
Islamic concept of itjihad, jihad or struggle with oneself. For the
Chassidic teachers, the battle that we are called to engage with is the battle
with our own yetzer ho’rah/the evil
inclination. It is that very inclination that the rabbis see as a positive
force when channeled into the building of homes and the loving creation of
families. The possibility of transformation is set in the deepest of human
urges.
Turning the metaphor into reality, the Karliner Rebbe, among
others, looks to the singular formation in the Hebrew, ki tetze la’mil’chamah al oy’vecha/when you go forth to battle against
your enemies and says very simply, zeh
yetzer ho’rah/this is the evil inclination. With the suffix for your in the singular, it is addressed to
each one of us. Of your enemy in the singular, the Slonimer Rebbe teaches that
this refers to ha’oyev ha’m’yuchad
shelcha/your specific enemy. We each have our own personal struggles, our
own demons. As the Slonimer teaches, we also each have a unique task and
purpose in the world that is only for us to complete. In order to accomplish
that unique purpose for which we are in the world, we must first overcome our
own personal demons, our own unique “enemies.”
The Chassidic way of reading Torah through a lens of
metaphor finds resonance in a statement from deep within Jewish tradition that
is brought into conversation with the beginning of Parashat Ki Tetze. Once having gone forth to battle, warning is
given that if a soldier desires a captive woman, he is to take her home and
make her his wife (Deut. 21:11-14). For all that is problematic, acknowledged,
wrestled, and cried with as we make our way through a harsh passage, in seeking
to control the evil inclination of the soldier, the commandment helps to control the possibility of rape
in war, which is no small matter in itself. From the Talmud (Kiddushin
21b), Rashi draws on a fascinating statement: lo debra Torah elah k’neged yetzer ho’rah/the Torah does not speak,
except to challenge the evil inclination.
In the
overall expression of this teaching and of Torah itself, the Torah seeks to
replace evil with good, offering ways to navigate its own harsh passages and
those of life; guiding us toward creation in the human sphere of a world of
wholeness and peace that does justice to the physical beauty of creation, the
world as it was envisioned at the very beginning. In speaking in relation to
the yetzer ho'rah/evil inclination,
there are times when the Torah offers opening and invitation to metaphor, when
that is to be our way of reading, and other times when the way is clear, when
we are meant to heed the commandments and respond to beauty of word and deed,
learning to affirm life and creation in all that we do. So does the Torah speak
not but in relation to the yetzer ho'rah/evil
inclination.

As we make our way through the Hebrew month of Elul toward
the new year that begins with Rosh Hashannah, looking within ourselves and
seeking to effect wholeness and make amends with others, the Slonimer suggests
that we need new “weapons” in the “fight” with our
yetzer. Language that I eschew, he writes,
the old weapons from years past are not sufficient/lo maspik ha’neshek
ha’yashan…; one needs, therefore, to search for ways and wisdom with which to
find the renewed weapon/aych lim’tzo et ha’neshek ha’m’chudash.
Grateful for the way of transformation in text and life that
our teachers have given us, at times I struggle with their language, even as I
often do with the language of our activism today. In the holy work of seeking
peace and justice, inspired by a way of reading Torah that transcends war, so
it is for us to transcend the language of war and then war itself. Seeking the
way of nonviolence in all of its fullness, in speech as well as in deed,
praying with our legs, means and ends as one, may we journey together to the
day that is all Shabbat shalom, a
world of peace and wholeness, shalom
u’sh’laymut.
Shabbat shalom,
Rabbi Victor Reinstein